@ jack - Holla - 07-02-2010
http://www.nabp.net/news/oregon-board-c ... th-or-law/
GG oregon
Re: @ jack - Firecrest - 07-02-2010
It's like a race between the entire west coast as to who can be the biggest faggot hippy state.
Re: @ jack - Zsigmond - 07-02-2010
Moving pot to Schedule 2 is a smart move. Schedule 1 is for street drugs that have no purpose in medicine (acid, dmt, and other psychedelics). Schedule 2 is for "highly addictive" drugs like morphine, cocaine, methadone, fentanyl, etc that still have medicinal purposes. So having mj as a C2 makes a little more sense- I believe it should be moved further down the list because it doesn't have the terrible physical dependence that the other schedule 2's have. Most pharmacies have marijuana in pill form, so having it as a C1 was harsh and kind of a catch-22
Re: @ jack - Holla - 07-03-2010
unfortunately the pill form marijuana u speak of, dronabinol, does not appear to have the same overall effect of smoking marijuana. while it is somewhat common for oncologists to prescribe dronabinol (which, yes is a schedule II) to cancer pts for n/v or appetite improvement, many who have smoked marijuana previously say dronabinol can't hold a candle to the relief that actually smoking marijuana provides.
i don't mind marijuana being dispensed from special dispenseries dedicated to providing medical marijuana alone, but i sure as hell don't want to be in charge of a) upkeep of marijuana plants b) dealing w/ even greater probabilities of theft cuz all u pot smoking hippies want some weed : P already risking my ass over some oxycodone !
Re: @ jack - jackslammer - 07-03-2010
the entire DEA scheduling system is out of whack
desoxyephedrine aka methamphetamine is only schedule 2
oxycontin, fentanyl, and dilaudid are all stronger than heroin and schedule 2
pcp is even fucking schedule 2
diazepam, aplrazolam, klonopin, etc. are all schedule 4 and are amongst the most addictive substances in the world
but ecstasy, pot, lsd, and mescaline which all hold no potential for addiction, have insanely high LD50s, and prove beneficial in psycophamacology are all schedule 1
???
the last century's worth of anti-drug propaganda and legislation is going to take generations to repair, god bless the internet, erowid ftw
Drug Enforcement Agency Wrote:Schedule I
The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse.
The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.
There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision.
Schedule II
The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse.
The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States or a currently accepted medical use with severe restrictions.
Abuse of the drug or other substances may lead to severe psychological or physical dependence.
Schedule III
The drug or other substance has a potential for abuse less than the drugs or other substances in schedules I and II.
The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.
Abuse of the drug or other substance may lead to moderate or low physical dependence or high psychological dependence.
Schedule IV
The drug or other substance has a low potential for abuse relative to the drugs or other substances in schedule III.
The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.
Abuse of the drug or other substance may lead to limited physical dependence or psychological dependence relative to the drugs or other substances in schedule III.
Schedule V
The drug or other substance has a low potential for abuse relative to the drugs or other substances in schedule IV.
The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.
Abuse of the drug or other substance may lead to limited physical dependence or psychological dependence relative to the drugs or other substances in schedule IV.
Re: @ jack - jackslammer - 07-03-2010
Holla Wrote:unfortunately the pill form marijuana u speak of, dronabinol, does not appear to have the same overall effect of smoking marijuana. while it is somewhat common for oncologists to prescribe dronabinol (which, yes is a schedule II) to cancer pts for n/v or appetite improvement, many who have smoked marijuana previously say dronabinol can't hold a candle to the relief that actually smoking marijuana provides. There are around 70 psychoactive compounds in marijuana that we have identified, some are more readily available through different routes of administration. This is a great study about the effects of the primary cannabinoids http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/66/1/95
Holla Wrote:already risking my ass over some oxycodone ! Nucynta please!
Re: @ jack - CAN - 07-03-2010
the feds definitely understand how fucking annoying/retarded potheads are, hence schedule 1
Re: @ jack - Ethax - 07-03-2010
Klonopin ftw.
Re: @ jack - jackslammer - 07-04-2010
Firecrest Wrote:It's like a race between the entire west coast as to who can be the biggest faggot hippy state. Portland, Oregon is the most "patriotic" city in the United States actually.
http://menshealth.com/mhlists/patriotic ... p#slidetop
Re: @ jack - Crazy Diana - 07-04-2010
|