Posts: 3,409
Threads: 192
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
0
according to jack its not perfect for paladins yet
abec this is not the resource for healers
edit: however jack fixed his issues by modifying stat weights, still a good resource if you can configure it to your liking
Posts: 2,206
Threads: 441
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation:
0
Yeah I agree, the healing stuff is a fair bit off. Again, this is not a fucking post about YOURE DOING THIS WRONG, its just a resource to help some, I know it helped me open my eyes a little on some of my reforges for max avoidance, I gained .8% avoidance by using it.
Trying to argue that fact that its OMG SO WRONG is an obvious statement so save your key strokes and use the site as a resource, not as a encyclopedia.
Posts: 596
Threads: 82
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation:
0
You are a dumb and terrible mage
Posts: 3,447
Threads: 149
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation:
0
I wasn't too impressed with the suggestions it was giving me when I looked the other day. It didn't tell me to do anything ridiculously stupid, but it did give way too much weight to spellpower. This causes it to suggest a WotLK enchant for gloves instead of 50 Haste. This particular mistake is a common flaw that occurs in many of these modeling sites/programs. As is the suggestion of PT over HS on weapon. In theory, PT is better than HS - but in practice that requires timing the 50% reduced healing of DP with a random proc off your weapon instead of using it when lulls in combat permit. A far from ideal proposition in reality.
I think these kinds of sites work well for fixing mistakes on your alts or looking up people whose class you don't play. But if you know what you're doing, the best these sites can do for you is to catch something you missed but already knew. At worst, they will tell you to do something that's just plain wrong.
Edit:
This is what I get for typing a response between tasks at work. You guys had a whole conversation while I was writing this.