![]() |
|
First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - Printable Version +- (https://wuthapn.com/forums) +-- Forum: WHAR LEWTS PLZ HALp (https://wuthapn.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: GINERAL FORUM (https://wuthapn.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? (/showthread.php?tid=3546) |
Re: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - Firecrest - 03-19-2012 CAN Wrote:you complain way to much for being like 50 years old dudeI thought that's what old people did? Man. My AARP membership booklet lied to me! Re: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - Regolith - 03-19-2012 •The biggest Virmen of them all is Hoptallus, the next boss. He has a furlwind attack and carrot breath that you have to avoid. Bunny version of brutallus Re: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - Firecrest - 03-19-2012 GET OFF MY LAWN Re: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - Crazy Diana - 03-19-2012 hey man, im hoping they dont have a sapphiron mechanic for you to mess up on too! Re: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - Riinuka - 03-21-2012 You either get an item, or gold instead, and you can get duplicates of what you already have. It won't be any faster gearing up. Re: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - Firecrest - 03-21-2012 You've still removed the chance of dropping an item that no one can use and replaced it with the guarantee of things someone can use. I get the difference between drops that someone "can use" and things that they "need/want/don't already have". But you've removed the chance for Shaman loot to drop in a 10 man with no Shaman. Or Holy Pally loot in a raid with only Rets. How does that not speed up gearing? Re: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - lawlerbation the hardcore squatter - 03-21-2012 how is that a bad thing? I remember when people were almost in tears in vent about RNG, instances seeding, and all the other bullshit associated with the previous poor loot mechanics. Im so confused
Re: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - Talith - 03-21-2012 lawlerbation Wrote:how is that a bad thing? Not hard to remember, people still are in tears in vent about all that shit. They cry every single boss kill, of every instance Re: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - CAN - 03-21-2012 i dont know what you guys are talking about, it was cool taking a year to get wrath legs Re: First Pandas, then Pokemon, then...??? - Firecrest - 03-21-2012 lawlerbation Wrote:how is that a bad thing?I didn’t say it was bad. I said I was conflicted about it. Which is to say that I’m not quite sure how I feel yet. Like Cahn, I spent the full year of ICC looking to get my BiS bracers that literally dropped once out of the entire 54 weeks (fucking Darktwig). That was frustrating. BUT it did make me actually want to get up and clear the place week after week. And it made Festerface an exciting fight week after week because there was always that five seconds of anticipation as I ran over to see what he’d dropped. On the other hand, it was followed by five minutes of me wanting to punch my monitor. My current take away from the new loot system is that they can do whatever they want to LFR, cause who cares. That said, I do feel that you will have casuals whining about lack of content faster. However, I’ve heard that Blizzard is looking to push a much more aggressive content schedule going forward – so it may even out. Lastly, I think there will be serious issues to resolve if they think about pushing this out into NM/HM raiding. They will need to find a way for it to work with the thousands of guilds that award loot to deserving members via some kind of DKP system. |