![]() |
|
Furly - Printable Version +- (https://wuthapn.com/forums) +-- Forum: WHAR LEWTS PLZ HALp (https://wuthapn.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: GINERAL FORUM (https://wuthapn.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: Furly (/showthread.php?tid=2617) Pages:
1
2
|
Furly - Hitshade - 01-08-2011 Quote:I would like to have another good reliable lock. However Dots intends to be back next week and we have a high number of mages. That being said I've been disheartened by the performances of a few people in raid, and I welcome the chance to replace those who make mistakes or don't do good numbers with people we know can perform. Nobody should assume that their raid spot is set in stone. Get it out in the open good sir. Relaying your disappointment about some of our raiders to a potential recruit isn't going to help us. (To say nothing of the fact that we may not want to be talking shit about our raiders to potential recruits in the first place, lol) WHO BE SUCKIN? Re: Furly - Crazy Diana - 01-08-2011 its you hitshade Re: Furly - Hitshade - 01-08-2011
Re: Furly - lawlerbation the hardcore squatter - 01-08-2011 Hitshade Wrote:WHO BE SUCKIN? for omnitron http://www.worldoflogs.com/reports/go9y ... =304&e=727 Kristoo 119971 22.3 % Crucible 109019 20.2 % Jackslammer 107439 19.9 % Under 105786 19.6 % Benjaminy 90224 16.7 % they all took unnecessary damage i guess healers have a bit of an excuse along with that list further down on the link every range that didnt deal at least as much damage as bonquiqui or under for magmaw http://www.worldoflogs.com/reports/go9y ... 324&e=1706 not 100% sure(because i do not remember getting hit by the pillar and being sent air born) but every one on there possibly failed http://www.worldoflogs.com/reports/go9y ... 324&e=1706 almost every one below 10% damage delt maloriak everyone that did 11k dps and lower for chimaeron it is a healing reliant fight and as i am not up to par on that artamedes there were multiple fails to mechanics over the course of our first night of attempts then culminated with a successful kill with 23 people and almost every single tracking breath targeted onto sanderz. Take that how you will. A decent conclave of winds kill even though alot of us ate some lag ALONG WITH ALMOST 3-5 PEOPLE ON EVERY FIGHT DEALING LOWER DAMAGE THAN THEIR CLASSMATES Re: Furly - Sanderz - 01-08-2011 lawlerbation Wrote:artamedes I was loving that 4% during that attempt. Its really hard to run left which is evident by bonquiqui's ragequit. I had no mods other than recount going and I didn't see the boss fights before. I still didn't fail like your "raiders" did. Re: Furly - ArchmageFurly in three days - 01-08-2011 Hitshade Wrote:Quote:I would like to have another good reliable lock. However Dots intends to be back next week and we have a high number of mages. That being said I've been disheartened by the performances of a few people in raid, and I welcome the chance to replace those who make mistakes or don't do good numbers with people we know can perform. Nobody should assume that their raid spot is set in stone. The post was targeted to everyone, not Icaria. People have been talked to that have been underperforming. Re: Furly - Hitshade - 01-08-2011
Re: Furly - CAN - 01-08-2011 lawlerbation Wrote:artamedes sanderz is better than jack and alyse make him paladin cl Re: Furly - Sanderz - 01-09-2011 Can is always right. Make him guild leader. Re: Furly - spence - 01-09-2011 http://www.worldoflogs.com/reports/go9y ... mageTaken/ |