12-13-2010, 01:52 PM
I would actually suggest against forming the strongest possible 10 man that we could. So no A Team and B Team. If we can form one 25 man raid, I don't see why we couldn't form two reasonably equal 10 man groups and at the same time cull the portion of the raid that is underperforming. Or, if we have so many good players that no one in a 25 man raid is underperforming, make three 10 mans. Or five. Or fifty.
I don't really think we're in that position though. And if we are, I don't expect it to last long. If we manage to come up with a very strong 25 man raiding roster right now, how long will it be before people start Bosshole-ing out? "Content too hard" and "Content too boring" will happen. And what then?
I can definitely see an argument for "worry about that when we get there", but the inevitability of it seems pretty plain to me. As does the pain in the ass it will be to make that switch later instead of now.
Personally, I would make two equally skilled ten mans and then go down from there. Make a third that would be that "B Team" and then organize others for alts and trials and the like.
I don't really think we're in that position though. And if we are, I don't expect it to last long. If we manage to come up with a very strong 25 man raiding roster right now, how long will it be before people start Bosshole-ing out? "Content too hard" and "Content too boring" will happen. And what then?
I can definitely see an argument for "worry about that when we get there", but the inevitability of it seems pretty plain to me. As does the pain in the ass it will be to make that switch later instead of now.
Personally, I would make two equally skilled ten mans and then go down from there. Make a third that would be that "B Team" and then organize others for alts and trials and the like.